Affichage des articles dont le libellé est goal setting. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est goal setting. Afficher tous les articles

What Happens When I Fail?

When personal leadership pundits, like myself, write on the subject of goal setting, we typically focus on the importance of setting goals, as well as the satisfaction and benefits that result from accomplishing them. But there are other lessons to be learned from the process. These “other” lessons are sometimes counterintuitive to the virtues of traditional goal setting. Today’s post is about some of these less-heralded lessons.

Back in January, I ran my best marathon time. It was extremely satisfying and fulfilling. I was hoping to build on that success and do even better in my next marathon in March. When race day came, it was unpleasantly wet and humid, and my head, heart, and body struggled to get "into" the race. The moisture and humidity slowed virtually everyone's time down, and I was no different. To my chagrin, I not only missed my Boston Qualifying time again (My 11th failure to do so), I ran 37 minutes slower than in January.

The following day, I nursed my disappointment by committing again to do whatever was necessary to reach my goal, which had become so important to me. In the midst of this determined resolve borne, quite frankly, of self-disgust, I received an email from a personal mentor, who is also one of my goal accountability partners. This mentor -- Dr. Christopher P. Neck -- just happens to have completed 12 marathons himself, including the elite Boston and New York Marathons.

I can honestly say his email changed my life as it relates to my marathoning goals.

His response to the news of what I believed was a horrible performance was different than I expected. He taught me some important lessons about goal setting, life balance, and life in general. Here are some excerpts from his e-mail:

JJ,

Congrats on another marathon finish.

You know, with marathons you are going to have good days and you are going to have bad days. That is just the nature of the marathon distance. Regardless of training, you never know what is going to happen on race day.
Now, I'm not going to give you what you probably want to hear, but here goes: Celebrate the victory, man! You just ran 26.2 miles. However you slice it, that is a good day.

Moving forward, I suggest a different self-leadership perspective. You now have a son. He could care less about your weight, or PR, or your training approaches. What he sees and will grow up seeing is a dad who places emphasis on fitness. What an amazing thing.
To be honest, I see too much rigidness and stress in your process. To me, the fact that your weight is down 15 pounds, you just ran a marathon, and you've been able to train as you have with a baby/toddler, you are the man! Lighten up on yourself and enjoy the ride....

Fascinatingly, another of my goal accountability partners and mentors -- my older brother Joe, who is also a Boston Marathon qualifier -- sent me a shorter e-mail with a similar message. Such upbeat words and attitudes from two Boston Qualifiers I have great respect for helped frame the situation in its proper perspective. It also alleviated an enormous amount of unnecessary self-inflicted pressure. Instead of feeling sorry for myself because I had run poorly on race day, I began to feel good about the significant effort I had invested, and the fact that I made the attempt at all. I also began to reevaluate my goals in light of my life’s present circumstances.

Having a son -- who turned one last week -- has forever changed my life for the better. It has also left me with less discretionary time to train for marathons. In addition, my professional schedule, which includes a lot of travel, has become increasingly demanding this year. In light of these life realities, and after failing 11 times to meet the Boston qualifying standard, I have come to the conclusion that I may need to wait until I am older and the qualifying time isn’t so difficult. And thanks to the wise advice of my respected friend and brother, if that happens, I will be okay with it! I can still continue to run for fitness, focus on enjoying the process, and return to racing at shorter distances, which I have always enjoyed more and been better at anyway.

This does not mean I plan to give up on my marathon goal. I still have two more chances this year in June and October, and I plan to give it my best shot in both races. But if I don’t make it after that, I am going to temporarily retire from the marathon distance until I have more time freedom and a less competitive qualifying time. In the meantime, I will continue to run for fitness and the simple joy I get from running without unhealthily impinging on my family life, professional career, or personal mental hygiene.

Tony Robbins has said:
“When you succeed, you tend to party; but when you fail, you tend to ponder.”
I am grateful for the opportunity this “failure” has provided me to ponder my marathon goal in the greater context of my life. I am also grateful for the blessing of mentors and goal accountability partners who help me to keep things in their proper perspective. Sometimes that means, rather ironically, lowering my own ambitious standards. This has given me greater patience, more realistic expectations, and allowed me to better ENJOY the process!



Points to Ponder:

Are there any personal or professional goals you would be wise to revise based on your personal situation, or your life’s true priorities?

Do you currently have mentors and goal accountability partners who can counsel you as you pursue your personal vision, mission, and goals? If not, who will you ask to do so?

Finding Freedom in INTRApersonal Competition

In last week's post, I discussed the importance of focusing primarily on intrapersonal competition (competing against yourself) rather than interpersonal competition (competing against others) in goal setting.  This is an important aspect of setting SMARTIES Goals.  Today, I share my story that influenced me to change my own viewpoint of competition.

Growing up, I was a very competitive kid.  My passions were running and basketball.


My goal was usually to beat anyone I was competing against.  This objective held up pretty well as a kid. I was always one of the first ones chosen on playground teams growing up, where it was not unusual for me to be "leading the pack."  In the process, I found enormous satisfaction from "beating others" in interpersonal competitions.

As a sophmore, I finished fourth at the Utah State cross-country meet.  For my Junior year, I set a goal to be the 2A State Champion.  I wrote down my goal and displayed it in a prominent place in my bedroom.

That season, I worked hard.  I continually envisioned myself crossing the finish line before anyone else.  My focus and hard work paid off, and I accomplished my goal of becoming a State Champion.

But then something interesting happened: I got greedy.  I really liked the color and appearance of the bright, gold, first-place medal, and I wanted more and more of it.  The following spring, I set my sights on more gold.  This time, I would win all four of my events so I could get FOUR gold medals.

Long story short, I fell short of my track goal.  Instead of four first place finishes at state, I finished with two seconds, a third, and a fourth: zero gold!

I was very disappointed.  For many years after that, I viewed my senior track season as being largely a failure because I did not win any of my events.  This perspective was unfortunate -- and naive.  Why?  Because I had run personal best times in all three distances during the State Meet.  It was the best I had ever done before.  Regardless of my finish compared to others, I should have been very pleased with my performances. I had not yet learned my lesson in intrapersonal competition yet.   

Several years later, after I had completed my 2-year mission, I was again running competitively, this time in college.  College was different than high school. Instead of winning multiple races and being one of the best runners, I rarely won.

Despite my lack of victories, I began noticing something in my performance that was enormously satisfying to me.  The three best races of my life were all run in college, and I did not win any of them.  What made them my best races? First, I ran a personal best time in each one.  Second, I knew in my mind and heart that I had given a complete effort; I had left it all on the track.  I may not have been winning races anymore, but I was getting better, and somehow, that was just as sweet, if not sweeter, than beating others.  

The heightened level of competition in college taught me the great truth that there will almost always be someone out there who is bigger, faster, stronger, smarter, wealthier, and more talented than me, and that is okay!  In this world of over 7 billion people, no one else is exactly like me.  No one else has the same genetics, circumstances, and experiences I do.

This fact makes me at least one in 7 billion, and the same is true for YOU!

This does not mean that competing against others does not have its place, or that you shouldn't try to be better than your competition.  What it means is that competition with others should always be secondary to competition with yourself.  If you focus first on being your best, then your place among others will take care of itself.  If, on the other hand, you become too focused on beating others, you will waste time and energy that could be invested in bettering your own performance.

In our culture, we are conditioned for competition with others.  Media is littered with advertisements that implicitly pit you against the beauty, intelligence, and supposed sophistication of others.  You can't watch television without coming across all kinds of competition programming.  From sports and gameshows to reality shows like Survivor and the Bachelor, there is no shortage of high profile interpersonal competition available just a remote-click away.  This makes it extra challenging to focus your time and energy on intrapersonal competition.

To make matters worse, we often exacerbate these comparisons by pitting our biggest weaknesses against the greatest strengths of others, which is terribly unfair.  In the end, your whole perspective gets knocked askew of reality, and you are left feeling unmotivated and discouraged.

By focusing primarily on being your own best self, you not only increase the likelihood of turning in your own, best performance, but you also maximize your chances for success when you compete with others.  It is a win/win!

Points to Ponder...

In what ways do you waste time and energy worrying about how you compare with others?

What could you do to reinvest this same time and energy in producing your personal best?

The Satisfaction of Goal Achievement

Last weekend, I traveled to Jackson, Mississippi to run the Mississippi Blues Marathon as part of my SMARTIES Goal.  It was the first of four marathons I plan to run this year in my quest to qualify for the elite Boston Marathon.

I am pleased to report that I met my goal of running under 3 hours and 30 minutes.  I also broke my March 1st goal of running under 3 hours and 20 minutes.  My time for the race was 3:18.00.

While I still have my work cut out for me to qualify for Boston (I must run under 3:05.00), it was very satisfying to meet two of my goals for the year so early on in January.

Having experienced the defeat and deflation of missing the mark by 70 minutes after my second marathon, it felt pretty good to narrow that margin down to only 14 minutes after my 9th try at the distance.  Most importantly, I ran my best time ever by over 12 minutes.  Getting a new "PR" (personal record) was one of the highlights of the day for me.  It definitely made the hard work feel worth it.

The Self-Action Leadership (SAL) philosophy teaches that self-competition is more important than competition with others, and that it is the only authentic form of fair competition. No two people are exactly alike in this world, so the concept of fair interpersonal competition is really a misnomer.  If you can honestly say to yourself at the end of a day, race, project, school year/program/degree, etc., that you have given your best effort, then you are, at that moment, consummately successful in that area, and there is no comparison in the world that can or should tarnish the joy and exultation of that priceless self-knowledge.  The SAL Theory and Model is designed to always focus your mind primarily on becoming your best, not on bettering the performances of others.

This is not to say that competition with others is bad or should be entirely avoided.  Interpersonal competition has its place, but that place must always be secondary to the intrapersonal competition that motivates you to become your best.  For example, it felt good to know that I finished 28th place out of 827 finishers on Saturday, but I wasn't about to let the fact that 27 people beat me dilute the enormous satisfaction I felt at having just run a marathon 12 minutes faster than I have ever run before.  In next week's post, I will share the journey that led me to change my thinking to focus primarily on self-competition instead of competition with others.

In the meantime, I wish to thank all my readers for being my "Accountability Partners" for my Boston Marathon qualifying goal.  Knowing that I am committed to report to you after each of my marathons this year has already provided me with much positive motivation to invest my best efforts to achieve my goals.  It is helping me, and I thank you!

In consideration of my performance on Saturday, I have adjusted my new goals moving forward as follows:

March 1st Marathon in The Woodlands, Texas: Run under 3 hours and 10 minutes.  Also, lose 15 more pounds prior to race (I've already lost 10; I have 20 to go to be in top form).  This goal will prove the most challenging for me because discipline and temperance with sugar, soda, and other less healthy foods has never been my strong suit.

June 14th Marathon in Provo, Utah: Run under 3 hours and 5 minutes and qualify for the 2015 Boston Marathon.  Lose an extra five pounds to weigh in at #160 or less on race day. (I weighed about #180 on race day last Saturday)

October 4th in St. George, Utah: Break the 3 hour barrier.      

Combatting "Insanity": My 2014 New Year's Resolution

In last week's post, I taught the principles of SMARTIES Goals.  As promised, this week, I will share with you my 2014 New Year’s Resolution, which is to qualify for the elite Boston Marathon, and describe it as a SMARTIES Goal.

I must confess to cheating a bit in that I actually started working on this goal three years ago.  Fortunately, this kind of cheating is encouraged!  You don’t have to wait for the New Year to set goals—especially SMARTIES Goals.  Furthermore, goals that are challenging and important sometimes take several tries before you accomplish them.

I am a runner.  I ran my first race at age 6.  In high school, I was a State Champion in cross-country.  In college, I was an All-American in track & field.  I have a lot of experience with running and racing.  After I turned 30, I wanted to start tackling longer races – half and full marathons.  In 2011, my brother challenged me to qualify for the elite Boston Marathon with him.  His challenge helped me turn my goal into a SMARTIES Goalby adding Specificity, Measurablity, and Accountability.

I worked hard and ran a lot of miles in preparation for my Boston Qualifying race in Salt Lake City in July 2011.  Unfortunately, I fell short of my goal.  Nay, I speak too lightly; I fell embarrassingly short.  I was completely and utterly humbled by the marathon distance and missed my mark by nearly 70 minutes!  I’ll never forget the deflating experience of running past my wife and other family members who had patiently and cheerfully waited over an hour longer than anticipated for me to pass by.  My body, mind, and ego were so bruised that I stopped running for four months!

The final “S” in the acronym SMARTIES stands for “Sane,” and refers to goals that you re-set after failing on previous attempts.  As discussed last week, the definition of insanity is: Doing the same things over and over while expecting different results.  In order to set a "SANE" follow-up goal, I had to examine what I had done – and had not done – to prepare in 2011, and then make changes to my future training to avoid getting the same result. 

My brother Joe did qualify for the Boston Marathon in 2011, so I asked him what he had done to train.  First, he completed an intense 60-day strengthening video course which, ironically, was called Insanity®  Second, he had run several marathons before.  Lastly, Joe had invested great time and effort over multiple years participating in long-distance bike riding and racing.  He had even competed in the grueling Leadville 100-mile mountain bike race SEVEN times!  As such, both his mind and body were well conditioned to lengthy and arduous physical challenges. 

Following in the footsteps of someone who had qualified for Boston, in 2012, I completed the 60-day Insanity video course myself.  I spent much more time running outside instead of running too many miles on the treadmill.  I also ran FOUR marathons in 2012 to condition my body and mind to competing at long-distances.  The results of these changes were significant.  I ran 48 minutes faster than I had in 2011! While I failed again in my goal to qualify for Boston, I got much closer than I had before.  I felt GREAT about my race and was motivated to keep trying until I met my ultimate goal.

Last year was an unusually busy year for my family and me that included a move, a new baby, and the completion of my graduate studies.  Now that I am settled, graduated, and not expecting any newborns in 2014, I am ready and motivated to try again to achieve my elusive goal to qualify for the Boston Marathon.  But, is it a SMARTIES Goal?

First, let’s review the components of a SMARTIES Goal as introduced in last week’s post:

Specific
Measurable
Attainable & Accountable
Relevant
Time-bound
In competition primarily with yourself
Engaging
Sane

SPECIFIC: Qualify for the Boston Marathon in (at least) one of four 2014 marathons: Jackson, Mississippi;  The Woodlands, Texas;  Provo, Utah;  & St. George, Utah.

MEASURABLE: Run under 3 hours and 5 minutes (requirement for Boston).  Time goals for specific marathons include: Jackson in January (sub 3:30), The Woodlands in March (sub 3:20), Provo in June (sub 3:10), and St. George in October (break the 3 hour barrier).

ATTAINABLE: Check.

ACCOUNTABLE:  My wife, four friends, and YOU, my readers, are accountability partners.

RELEVANT:  My goal is relevant to my physical and mental health. Nothing like a vigorous run to clear your head, soften your heart, and lower your cholesterol.  

TIME-BOUND.  There are specific dates for each marathon.

IN COMPETITION PRIMARILY WITH MYSELF:  Check.  No goals to beat anyone but my own personal best time and the clock.

ENGAGING: Check.  I love to run and to race.

SANE: I have made several additional adjustments to my training regimen this time around.  For example, I started both my cardio and strength training several months earlier than I did in 2011 or 2012.

This weekend, I compete in my first of four marathons for the year.  My goal is to run under 3 hours and 30 minutes.  Wish me luck.  More importantly, I wish YOU luck as you begin the process of setting your own SMARTIES Goal for 2014.

If you’d like to share your SMARTIES goal, e-mail me at jordan.jensen@freedomfocused.com.  If I get any responses, I will share them in my post next week, along with my results from the Mississippi Blues Marathon in Jackson. 

Resolutions that Stick: The SMARTIES Principle

HAPPY NEW YEAR!


As the New Year dawns, it is tradition to set goals to better yourself.  The perennial question, however, is: How do I make New Years’ Resolutions that actually last past January 2nd?

There are two basic reasons New Years Resolutions flop.  The first arises from setting too many goals.  The second occurs from a failure to set SMART Goals.  SMART, in this context, is an acronym.  It stands for Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound.  The SMART model is an excellent method for goal setting, but there is more, and that is why I encourage self-action leaders to include four additional guidelines to their goal setting.  These additional recommendations turn SMART goals into SMARTIES Goals, as follows:

Specific
Measurable
Attainable and Accountable
Relevant
Time-bound
In competition primarily with yourself
Engaging
Sane

With one exception—Accountability—SMARTIES Goals are the same as SMART Goals up through the “T.”  I will, therefore, focus on the four additions: Accountability, In Competition Primarily With Yourself, Engaging, and Sane.

First: Find an Accountability Partner.  Tell someone else about your SMARTIES goal.  If you are the only person who knows about your goal, it is easy to give up when the going gets tough.  An accountability partner provides encouragement and positive peer pressure to stick with goal(s) you set.

When I first started running marathons, my older brother was my accountability partner.  Even though he lived across the country, our e-mails back and forth and my knowledge that he knew about my goal provided encouragement and motivation to stick with my goal during those grueling 20-plus mile training runs.

Second: Set goals focused primarily on self-competition.  While competition with others can be highly motivating for some, it can be a deflating experience for others.  Furthermore, no matter who you are, there will always be someone bigger, taller, faster, smarter, wealthier, luckier, younger/older, more talented, and the list goes on.  Because of this, goals that compete with others often end in perceived failure—even if you have bettered yourself in the process! 

Instead of wasting time and energy in comparisons, why not reinvest it in self-betterment and reaching your own potential?  Doing so will not only afford you with self-improvement, but will naturally make you more competitive with others as well—if that is your goal.  As a competitive runner, some of the best races I ever ran I did not win, but I did run a personal best time.  Since learning this lesson, my place in the final standings of a race has become secondary to my personal time and effort, and my enjoyment of the entire goal-setting process has increased.    

Third, set goals that engage your interest.  Goals that don’t excite are painful to pursue and rarely accomplished.  I often set goals related to distance running because physical wellness and racing are both exciting to me.   

Fourth, set sane goals.  This last guideline is designed for goals you are re-setting after falling short on previous attempts.  A popular definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again while expecting different results.  Setting sane goals means that if at first you don’t succeed, then don’t just try again.  First, reevaluate your methods and see where you need to make changes before trying again.  Then, make the necessary adjustments as part of your next attempt.

In my first attempt to qualify for the Boston Marathon in 2011, I missed my qualifying time by 70 minutes.  The following year, I made some important training adjustments aftertalking to a runner who had already qualified.  As a result, I ran 45 minutes faster in 2012!  I took 2013 off from marathon running.  This year, I am making further adjustments to my training regimen to get even closer to my ultimate goal of running in Boston, hopefully next year.     


I challenge you to set a SMARTIES goal for yourself in 2014.  Next week, I will share my own SMARTIES goal thereby making you, my reader, my Accountability Partner!  

Original source of SMART Goals: Doran, G. T. (1981). There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Management Review,                       70(11), 35-36.