 |
| Were America's Founding Fathers Good Guys or Bad Guys? Authenticists and Postmodernists approach this question using divergent methodologies. |
What is presentism?
According to Ross K. Baker, a distinguished professor of political science at Rutgers University, presentism is a "term used in academic circles to describe the application of contemporary moral standards to people who lived long ago." [1]
When historians and others engage in presentism, they set themselves up as judges in an anachronistic court of condemnation.
Who are the targets of these postmodern revisionist judgements? The answer to this question is varied. However, the favorite targets of presentist historians and postmodern judges are often historical figures who are, in many regards, worthy of our just admiration, commendation, gratitude, and respect. Postmodern purveyors of presentism are particularly fond of demonizing the Founding Fathers of the United States while glancing over, or entirely ignoring, their august lives and unprecedented achievements.
 |
| An American Bible in my personal Library |
I was born in an obscure, diminutive, magnificent little hamlet in the four corners area of the United States (Monticello, UT). This area is so out-of-the-way (it is a 4-5 hour drive from the nearest major metropolitan area) and is surrounded with such an eclectic and surreal panorama of topographical scenery that when Hollywood movie director Andrew Stanton needed a filming location resembling the extraterrestrial planet Mars for his movie, John Carter, he chose to roll his cameras in the Four Corners area!
I'll never forget seeing the movie trailer for John Carter back in 2012 because I immediately recognized the iconic monadnock known as Shiprock—located in the northwest corner of New Mexico. Any Monticelloan would recognize this famous landmark, which, on a clear day, you can see from elevated parts of town, despite its being located nearly 100 miles away.
Click HERE to watch the trailer for John Carter.
Despite being born far beyond the reach of most of the outside world and before the days of the Internet, I was blessed to be born to a family with educated parents who valued books. And thanks to the civic-minded contributions of community pillar Dorothy Adams—a great aunt of mine—Monticello had a public library.
The Monticello branch of the San Juan County Library was not large; all of the books were contained in one big room. Nevertheless, it was sizable enough to contain thousands of books—more than I could ever hope to read in my youth. As such, it provided me with a perpetual supply of books and other materials I could check out and study at my leisure. Even better, the librarian had a portable cart of books that was kept stocked with out-of-circulation books for sale; and the price was usually right for a poor teenager's budget!
The American "Prophets" as Hubbard dubbed them, are as follows: Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Robert G. Ingersoll, Walt Whitman, Abraham Lincoln, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and her husband, Elbert Hubbard, whose writings she lovingly, albeit nepotistically, lavished nearly half the book's contents, despite his relative obscurity compared to the other "Prophets."
It is true that these men and women were not perfect—no mortal leader in our country's history (or any other's) was or is. But it is in our collective interest to hold up the positive aspects of their lives and legacies and thereby allow their powerful examples to positively influence our own walks through life.
Unfortunately, postmodernists tend to focus only on the negative aspects of America's founding fathers and mothers—and America in general. While the fundamental tenets of postmodernism posit that there really isn't any objective right and wrong, postmodernists are always first in line to hypocritically point out all of the "Sins" of those who, in actuality, made our Nation great.
For a postmodernist, there is no such thing as "Truth" with a capital "T." But when it comes to their own truth, they are ironically certain and intractably inflexible. Whimsical or evolutionary as their deconstructed "truth" may in fact be, postmodernists are quick to capitalize, star, asterisk, bold, and underline their own homespun dogma. They also like to add obtrusive neon lights that shine forth in a militant attempt to coerce others to embrace their view through social intimidation, political fiat, or any other culturally tenable means. Those who don't agree with them are castigated as misguided heretics and unenlightened cretins.
 |
| Postmodernists focus on faults and failings while downplaying or even ignoring virtues. |
Postmodernists like to apply the perverse paint of presentism to the pages of history. To a presentist, George Washington is an evil man because he should have been following every accepted standard and mores of the twenty-first century even though he never even lived to see the nineteenth. Is that realistic? Is that even fair? (I should note here that unlike many of his contemporaries, Washington actually freed his slaves in his will).
Click HERE to learn more about Postmodernism
Click HERE to read more about the AGE of AUTHENTICISM aiming to replace it.
 |
| Authenticists acknowledge shortcomings & sins, but focus on virtues and victories. |
To this question I answer with a resounding, No!
Unfortunately, in their eagerness to focus entirely on the sins of those they don't like or agree with, postmodernists cynically toss out the proverbial "baby with the bathwater." Instead of heralding what a great man or woman did right in his or her life and honoring whatever meaningful service they contributed to our nation, they choose instead to hold up and even actively promote a legacy polluted by their sins.
There are many problems with this practice. First, it places the focus on what "not to do" rather than what "to do," which is a pedagogical recipe for failure. Second, instead of seeking out objective truth about the panoramic dynamic of history's multi-dimensional realities, it strives to rewrite the narrative altogether, casting it subjectively in whatever light pleases one's own ideological prerogative. Third, it exposes an agenda that is skewed in favor of a particular constituency. Fourth, it divides rather than unifies by perpetuating divisions that existed decades or even centuries ago into contemporary society.
In what is sometimes a postmodernist's well-intentioned efforts to objectify history, what actually occurs is the reopening of wounds that could and should have healed long ago. By continually reopening wounds instead of striving to heal them, the erstwhile divisions linger—and in some cases widen—ironically taking us backwards instead of forwards in our understanding of, and reaction to, historical narratives. As a result, we become an increasingly divided nation both socially and culturally.
Professor Baker of Rutgers University (quoted at the beginning of this article) recently wrote a compelling argument against "Presentism" in a USA Today newspaper op-ed. According to Baker, presentism:
"Mercilessly subjects history and historical figures to contemporary social enlightenment. It is smug and self-satisfied and pats itself on the back for its own high-mindedness, but it is ignorant of context and erects impossibly high obstacles to which virtually no major figure can measure up. Certainly no one who had to endure the give-and-take of politics and the chore of dealing with people with whom they did not agree." [2]
Postmodernists and presentists are famously cynical and pessimistic; they are also profoundly contradictory and hypocritical. They hand down merciless judgments regarding who was good and who was evil while simultaneously suggesting there really is no objective good and evil in the first place. Moreover, they concurrently spend their lives and careers focusing on the sins of whoever they don't like or disagree with, implying all the while that they and their historical acolytes live and lived lives that were beyond reproach.
In answer to these postmodernists, I issue a clear and unapologetic message. My message comes from the only man who ever claimed—and for which a third of the world's population believes—to have actually lived a perfect life. The message is simple and lucid: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
Since none of us can make a legitimate claim on perfection, let's ALL stop throwing stones at each other and strive to study objective history (insomuch as we possibly can) with an emphasis on the redeeming qualities of history's actors, rather than continually trumpeting the worst angels of their nature.
 |
| FREEDOM FOCUSED is calling for a reset on the relationship with our imperfect, but noble Founding Fathers. |
I invite ALL Americans to reconsider the virtues of our Founding Fathers. I do not ask you to excuse or pardon their moral failings (which they, like ALL of us, certain had). I simply ask you to look at them for what the really were—imperfect, yet extraordinary men and women without whom we would not possess the liberty we enjoy today; a liberty which has made possible our respective rights to write out our diverse viewpoints on the subject.
If you want to get off to a great start, I encourage you to buy and read a book called "The Making of America: The Substance and Meaning of the Constitution" by W. Cleon Skousen, and "The Real Thomas Jefferson" by Andrew M. Allison and edited by W. Cleon Skousen et al.
Click HERE to buy a copy of The Making of America.
Click HERE to buy a copy of The Real Thomas Jefferson.
Notes:
[1] Baker, R.K. (2015). Voices: Democrats foolishly purge heroes: By Applying Today's Standards, Presidents Jefferson, Jackson, Wilson & FDR Get the Boot. USA Today. 10 August 2015. URL: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/08/07/democrats-presidents-jefferson-jackson-wilson-fdr/31207363/ Click HERE to access article
[2] Ibid
Click HERE to buy a copy of Dr. Jordan Jensen's new book, Self-Action Leadership: The Key to Personal, Professional, & Global Freedom.
........................................................................................................................................................
SELF-ACTION LEADERSHIP is the key catalyst for initiating transformational leadership that lasts in any organization. The truth of the matter really is that simple; and the transformation of organizations through the holistic development of individuals really is that difficult—yet altogether possible for anyone willing to invest the time, effort, and sacrifice required to achieve authentic, transformational results.
Unlike any training program that has ever preceded it, Self-Action Leadership provides a single vehicle wherewith individual self-leaders can discover—and then act—upon the great truth that HOLISTIC personal development and growth spanning the mental, moral, spiritual, physical, emotional, and social elements of our individual natures is within the grasp of each one of us.
Note: Freedom Focused is a non-partisan, for-profit, educational corporation. As such, we do not endorse or embrace political figures. We do, however, comment from time-to-time on historical or political events that provide pedagogical backdrops to illuminating principles contained in the SAL Theory & Model.
To receive weekly articles from Freedom Focused & Dr. Jordan R. Jensen, sign up with your e-mail address in the white box on the right side of this page where it says "Follow by E-mail."
Click HERE to read more about Dr. Jensen's book, Self-Action Leadership, and to review what experts in the leadership field are saying about this groundbreaking new personal development handbook.
Click HERE to learn more about Dr. Jordan R. Jensen.
Click HERE to visit the Freedom Focused website.
